What Our Clients Say:

  • Michael Hagemann - Age 52, Burley
    I appreciate your help in finding a health insurance plan for my family. You were very professional and seem very honest. Thanks again for your help.
    Total Savings: $132/month
  • Vincent Meyer - Age 56, Pocatello
    Idaho Health Insurance provided my family with comprehensive health care options that have saved us almost $140 a month despite our unique health care needs.
    Total Savings: $139/month
  • James Namorato - Age 37, Boise
    Thanks again for all your help....I wouldn't hesitate to recommend you to anyone looking for health care... you've been a tremendous help and it is much appreciated.
    Total Savings: $89/month
  • Mark Everett - Age 44, Nampa
    Your knowledge is invaluable in helping us make an informed decision, and I really appreciate your sharing it. Thank you for the good service!
    Total Savings: $129/month
  • Judith Sanchez - Age 54, Emmett
    Thank you very much with your assistance in obtaining an insurance program that meets my needs. I had spoken to a variety of people on this issue, but it was your personal touch, knowledge, and thorough communication that made me feel very comfortable to move forward.
    Total Savings: $136/month

Idaho Health Insurance

Free Quote for Your Health Insurance Policy.

We believe in treating our customers as part of our family and we will go out of the way to provide him with a quality online Idaho health insurance quote.

Your best place for online health insurance plans

  » We aim at extending the services for all those who pays their premiums within the stipulated period of time.

Did you know...?

Get Your Free Online Quotes Now

idaho health insurance providers

Obtain health insurance if you are self employed

Health insurance is one of the most controversial forms of insurance because of the conflict between the need for the insurance company to remain solvent versus the need of its customers to remain healthy, which many view as a basic human right. This conflict exists in a liberal healthcare system because of the unpredictability of how patients respond to medical treatment.

Suppose a large number of customers of a particular insurance company were to contract a rare disease costing 100 million dollars to fight for each patient. The insurance company would be faced with the choice of either charging all its future customers astronomical premiums (thus losing customers and going out of business), paying all claims without complaint (thus going out of business) or fighting the customers in an attempt to deny the costly treatment (thus outraging patients and their families, and becoming a target for lawsuits and legislation).

Today, most comprehensive private health insurance programs cover the cost of routine, preventative, and emergency health care procedures, and also most prescription drugs, but this was not always the case. Back in the late 19th century, early health insurance was actually disability insurance, in the sense that it covered only the cost of emergency care for catastrophic injuries that could (and often did) lead to a disability.

This artifact of history persisted right up to the start of the 21st century in some jurisdictions (like California), where all laws regulating health insurance actually referred to disability insurance. Patients were expected to pay all other health care costs out of their own pockets, under what is known as the fee-for-service business model. As the Industrial Revolution matured during the middle-to-late 20th century, traditional disability insurance evolved into modern health insurance as both employers and governments recognized the value of encouraging patients to seek regular checkups and preventative care from primary care physicians. It is usually much cheaper to treat diseases like cancer if they are diagnosed early.

Many countries have made the societal choice to avoid this important conflict by nationalizing the health industry so that doctors, nurses, and other medical workers become state employees, all funded by taxes; or setting up a national health insurance plan that all citizens pay into with tax or quasi-tax payments, and which pays private doctors for health care. These national health care systems also have their problems.

Some of these countries have citizen groups which protest bureaucracy and cost-cutting measures that unduly delay medical treatment. Similar issues exist with private health management insurances (HMO) in countries with privately funded medicine.

In the United States, health insurance is made more complicated by Federal Medicare/Medicaid programs, which have had the unintended consequence of determining the price of medical procedures. Many suspect that these prices are set independently of medical necessity or actual cost. A physician who refuses to accept a Medicare/Medicaid payment will be banned from accepting any such payments for a number of years, regardless of the reason for rejecting the payment or the amount offered. In either case, this means that private insurers have little incentive to pay more than the government does.

Some common complaints about private health insurance companies include:

  1. Insurance companies do not normally announce their health insurance premiums more than a year in advance. This means that, if you get sick, you may find your premiums greatly increased. This defeats the purpose of having insurance in the first place.

  2. If insurance companies try to charge different people different amounts based on your health, people will feel they are unfairly treated. Some states require that insurance companies cover all who apply at the same cost; this rule has the effect (called adverse selection) that healthy people subsidize sick ones, and thus only really sick people buy insurance and the premiums are very expensive.

  3. When a claim is made, it is in the best interest of the insurance company to use paperwork and bureaucracy to attempt to deny the claim. Some percentage of people will give up, leading to lower costs for the insurance company.

  4. Health insurance is only available at a reasonable cost through an employer-sponsored group plan. This means that unemployed individuals and self-employed individuals are at a disadvantage.

  5. Employers can write some or all of their employee health insurance premiums off of their taxable income whereas individuals have to pay taxes on income used to fund health insurance. This reduces the employee's bargaining power in negotiating service with the insurance provider and also increases their dependence on the employer. In the US, COBRA was passed in an attempt to address the latter concern.

  6. Experimental treatments are generally not covered. This practice is especially criticized by those who have already tried, and not benefited from, all "normal" medical treatments for their condition.

  7. The Health maintenance organization ("HMO") type of health insurance plan has been criticized for excessive cost-cutting policies. The least popular of these policies is having accountants or other administrators essentially making medical decisions for customers by deciding which types of medical treatment will be covered and which will not.